Stop selling to job titles, and start selling to situations instead
How to define your customer by their "horrible day" instead of their headcount.
đ Hi, Iâm James. I write Building Momentum to help you accelerate B2B SaaS growth through product marketing, GTM strategy, sales, and marketing.
Have you ever sat in a presentation where someone puts up a slide titled âOur ICPâ and it reads:
âB2B SaaS companies, $10M-$50M ARR, 50-200 employees, North America.â
And someone in the room asks: âSo... thatâs like 8,000 companies. Which ones should we actually call?â
Silence.
I see this pattern constantly. Companies with reasonable-sounding ICPs built entirely on firmographics: company size, industry, revenue range, location⌠nothing else.
Thatâs not an ICP.
Six months later, theyâre still stuck in the same place.
Marketing canât deliver the right leads
Sales teams spray and pray without focus
Win rates stay flat
Churn goes up
The team burns out
The problem isnât work ethic or the budget: itâs your ICP definition.
Most ICPs tell you what a company is, but they donât tell you when that company is ready to buy.
Situation influences purchase more than firmographics
The thing about firmographics is, theyâre static and tell you literally nothing. They describe a companyâs characteristics, but not their context.
A âSeries B SaaS companyâ could be crushing it or bleeding cash. They could have a world-class GTM engine⌠or a pipeline held together with hope and spreadsheets.
One is browsing, and the other is buying.
But a âSeries B SaaS company that just missed their board forecast by 40% and realized their pipeline has no repeatable processâ is in a completely different state. Thatâs a company in a situation⌠and situations create urgency.
Let me give you a real example.
At Headstart, before I joined, the ICP was purely firmographic. Consulting and professional services companies, specific revenue range, offices in certain locations. Standard stuff.
It wasnât working. The messaging was generic. Sales cycles were long. There was no pattern to wins.
So we shifted the definition. We started targeting companies that had published in their annual reports that diversity, equity, and inclusion was a strategic priority.
That was the trigger.
Once a company published that commitment, we knew they were serious.
We could reference their own language back to them. We could connect with people inside those organizations who personally cared about this work. The motivation was already there.
Everything changed. The sales team knew exactly who to target and when. The messaging got sharper because it could speak to a specific moment: the moment leadership made a public commitment. Close rates improved noticeably.
Why?
We stopped fishing in the ocean, and started fishing where the fish were already biting.
This is what I mean by situational ICP. The question isnât âwho is our ideal customer?â The real question is âWhat happened the week before they started looking for us?â
Was it a failed product launch?
A new executive who exposed gaps in the GTM? A competitor win that blindsided them?
A board meeting that went sideways?
A public commitment they now need to deliver on?
That specific moment, that trigger, is your real ICP.
When you shift to situational thinking, three things happen
Your messaging gets sharper.
Youâre not writing for âB2B SaaS companies.â
Youâre writing for âB2B SaaS companies whose last product launch flopped and the CEO is demanding answers.â
That specificity cuts through the noise and validates the pain before you even pitch the solution. It makes your prospect feel seen.
Your targeting gets easier.
You can build content around the trigger event, not just the company size.
Target companies with new hires in key roles. Companies that just announced funding. Companies that published commitments in annual reports. Companies that failed a compliance audit.
This powers ABM, outbound, and your entire content strategy.
Your close rates improve.
Because youâre reaching companies when theyâre actually ready to change.
Most of your market is stuck in inertia.
They know they have a problem, but the emotional cost of change feels too high.
But companies in a situation? Theyâve already overcome that inertia.
Something broke. Someoneâs mad. The status quo isnât acceptable anymore.
Youâre not convincing them they have a problem⌠youâre showing up exactly when theyâre ready to solve it.
Quick diagnostic: is your ICP sharp enough?
Before we go further, letâs diagnose your current ICP. Score yourself honestly on these 5 questions:
1. Can you describe their âhorrible dayâ in specific detail?
If you canât describe the exact moment their day falls apart, you donât understand their pain well enough to sell to it.
(Credit to Alicia Carney for this question!)
2. Can your sales team spot the difference between a good-fit and bad-fit lead in 5 minutes?
A sharp ICP gives your team conviction. They should confidently disqualify a bad fit early in the conversation.
3. Does your ICP exclude at least 70% of your total market?
Narrow focus isnât limiting⌠the opposite! Itâs liberating! It lets you build messaging that actually resonates.
4. Is there less than 2 steps between your feature and their revenue or cost outcome?
Every step is a chance for them to lose interest. âClose 30% more dealsâ is stronger than âbetter project management leading to faster shipping leading to more revenue.â
5. Are you seeing momentum with this segment?
If youâre not seeing faster cycles, higher win rates, and better retention, your ICP might be theoretically correct but practically wrong.
If you canât confidently say yes to at least 4 of these, your ICP is probably costing you deals.
Fix 1: Listen to sales calls
Donât skim - actually listen!
Your job is to find the moment of maximum frustration, the point where the prospectâs voice changes where they sound tired, or angry, or desperate.
That emotion is your trigger. Write down the exact situation they describe.
For example, you might hear: âThe CFO presents a messy pipeline report to board. CEO asks pointed questions the VP Sales canât answer. VP Sales gets told to âfix it in 30 days or weâll find someone who can.â They start Googling solutions that night.â
Thatâs a trigger. Thatâs the moment they became a strong, high-potential, motivated buyer.
Fix 2: Build your âNegative ICPâ
Pull a list of your highest-churn customers. What do they have in common? Industry patterns? Size? Mindset? Buying motion?
Write down the 5 attributes that scream churn, and turn that into a one-pager for your sales and marketing team. Make it easy for them to disqualify bad fits early, avoid targeting them in paid marketing, etc.
This is critical: disqualification is more important than qualification.
Every hour your team spends on a bad-fit prospect is an hour theyâre not spending on someone whoâs actually ready to buy.
Youâre not trying to build the perfect persona; youâre trying to get sharp enough that your messaging actually resonates.
And remember: your ICP isnât static.
Itâs going to evolve every 6 months as you learn whatâs working and whatâs not:
You might refine it to be even more niche
You might broaden it slightly as you find success in adjacent markets
Thatâs normal. The key is to commit to your current ICP with conviction for at least 6 months so you can actually learn from the market.
This is what I call the positioning loop:
Clarity (define your ICP)
Conviction (commit to it)
Consistency (execute for 6 months)
⌠so you can actually learn fast and narrow, without spraying and praying.
The fear of narrowing down is real
Every time Iâve recommended narrowing an ICP, Iâve gotten pushback from founders and CEOs.
âIf we go that narrow, weâll leave 90% of the revenue on the table.â
âWe need to keep it broad so we can see what sticks.â
âOur product works for everyone in this category.â
The fear is real. Nobody wants to miss being the next Salesforce because they niched too early.
But trying to be everything to everyone is the fastest way to become nothing to anyone.
You canât build authority with a broad ICP.
Authority requires a point of view.
And a point of view requires choosing who youâre for⌠and who youâre not.
I worked with a seller who focused on an uncomfortably narrow ICP. They only sold to one specific customer type, in a specific region. Their pitch was three sentences. Their close rate was ridiculously high. Customers barely asked questions before signing.
When I asked if they worried about leaving money on the table, they said: âNo. I worry about trying to serve everyone poorly instead of serving someone exceptionally well.â
That stuck with me.
Because narrowing your ICP doesnât shrink your business. It expands your impact.
When youâre crystal clear on who you serve, three things happen:
Your messaging gets sharp enough to cut through the noise
Your sales team can spot good fits instantly
Your product roadmap has a clear direction
The hardest part of strategy is saying no. But itâs also the most important part.
Stop fishing in the ocean
In B2B, you donât sell to company profiles. You sell to people in companies in specific situations that they desperately want to escape.
So hereâs what Iâd challenge you to do:
Stop building ICPs on demographic filters
Stop defining your market by company size and job titles alone
Instead, ask: âWhat happened the week before they started looking for us?â
Find that moment.
Build your messaging around it.
Target companies when theyâre in that situation.
Because thatâs when theyâre ready to buy, when you can actually help them move forward.


This is an increadibly sharp breakdown of why most ICPs fail. The shift from firmographics to situational triggers really captures the difference between spray-and-pray outbound and reaching buyers at the right moment. I especially love the 'horrible day' diagnostic because it forces specificity about pain instead of vague personas. When I ran growth at a SaaS startup, we wasted monthes targeting 'mid-market companies' before narrowing to 'teams dinged in security audits' and everything clicked.